Independent Services: Each service can be deployed and updated independently, providing more flexibility. An error in a microservice only affects a specific service and does not affect the entire application.

Also, adding new features to a microservice application is more accessible than a monolithic one.

Whether the application is large or small, adding new features and maintaining existing code is easy. Because it is sufficient to make changes only within the relevant service.

Better scalability: Each service can be scaled independently.

Therefore, the entire application does not need to be scaled. This saves a lot of time and money. Additionally, every monolithic application has limits in terms of scalability. However, multiplexing a service with traffic on the microservice is more convenient and can handle the whole load.

This is why most projects that appeal to a large user base have begun to adopt the microservice architecture.

Technology Diversity: Teams do not have to ultimately choose the technologies on which the services will be developed; they can select the appropriate technology for the services they will grow over time. For example, a service can be created with the Python programming language to use “machine learning” features next to microservices developed on .Net. The desired technology or database can be used for each microservice.

Higher level of agility: Any errors in a microservice application only affect a particular service, not the entire application. Therefore, all changes and tests are carried out with lower risks and fewer errors.

Teams can work more efficiently and quickly. Folks starting the project can easily adapt without getting lost in the code base.

Intelligibility: A microservice application broken down into smaller, simpler components is easier to understand and manage.

Since each service is independent of each other and only has its business logic, the code base of the service will be pretty straightforward. It is easier to understand and manage.

I'm sharing more.